Effective decision making is central to team progress. Team members who believe in the decision making process and its goals buy-in to the decisions. When the process is ineffective, decisions end up being reopened.

When your decisions have to be regularly remade how much does productivity suffer?

In MetaTeam your decision making process starts with decision models. Decision models provide a structure that helps catalyze resolution and catalogs the decisions history.

Since different situations require different tactics each teams may have as many decision models as needed to organize their decisions.

MetaTeam encourages structured decision making based on evidence and ranking. Decisions are ranked using four key impact measures. Ranking helps make prioritization more transparent.  

Teammates add facts and requirements in categorized collections. Your decision may be assigned as supporting one or more of the team's goals, including chartered goals. MetaTeam allows multiple resolution statements, or you may finalize the decision with a single conclusion.

To converge opinion and build consensus, MetaTeam encourages team members to express preferences by voting for options. As team leader you may choose which roles may add options. Decisions may be public or private. Voting may be open or by secret ballot.

With MetaTeam the basis for decisions is explicit and straightforward. People are heard. Resolutions are conclusive.

Suddenly decisions are getting made.